The Digital Press

A software developer argues that AI coding tools are overhyped and fundamentally no better than compilers, emphasizing that current AI coding slows productivity despite creating a feeling of improvement. He suggests the real problem lies in poor programming languages and tools, not the AI itself.

Why it matters: AI coding tools may mislead users into feeling more productive while actually slowing development and increasing technical debt.

The big picture: AI will eventually replace some programming jobs, like compilers and spreadsheets did, but only as a workflow tool, not as autonomous coders.

The stakes: Billions are wasted chasing AI hype instead of investing in better programming languages, compilers, and libraries that could truly improve coding.

Commenters say: Many agree AI helps with brainstorming and debugging but warn it reduces code understanding, encourages bad practices, and that natural language is a poor coding spec.