The Digital Press

Judges are increasingly experimenting with large language models (LLMs) to interpret legal texts, but experts warn these AI tools are neither neutral nor reliable arbiters of ordinary language meaning. The discretionary values and economic interests imposed by private AI developers pose significant risks to judicial impartiality and constitutional roles.

Why it matters: Using LLMs risks shifting legal interpretation power from judges to private companies with opaque agendas.

The big picture: LLMs reflect their creators’ biases and post-training modifications, making them unsuitable for unbiased statutory interpretation.

The stakes: AI-driven distortions could subtly manipulate judicial outcomes favoring corporate or ideological interests without accountability.

Commenters say: Many express concern over unregulated AI influence in courts, emphasizing the need for transparency and caution in judicial AI adoption.